Xeon E5-4610 v3 vs Xeon W3690

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4610 v3 vs Xeon W3690 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4610 v3 vs Xeon W3690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4610 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W3690

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4610 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,191 vs 7,229).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $583 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4610 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4610 v3 better than Xeon W3690?

Yes. Xeon E5-4610 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4610 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4610 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4610 v3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W3690 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-4610 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $583 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W3690 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-4610 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011), 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-4610 v3 vs Xeon W3690 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4610 v3

The Xeon E5-4610 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,229 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W3690

The Xeon W3690 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,191 points. Launch price was $450.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4610 v3 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W3690 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-4610 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 v3 versus 3.73 GHz on the Xeon W3690 — a 74.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W3690 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.46 GHz). The Xeon E5-4610 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3690 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4610 v3 scores 7,229 against the Xeon W3690's 7,191 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4610 v3. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4610 v3 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3690.

Feature	Xeon E5-4610 v3	Xeon W3690
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	3.73 GHz+119%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	3.46 GHz+104%
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)+108%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Gulftown (2010−2011)
PassMark	7,229	7,191

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4610 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3690 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.