Processor 300 vs Xeon E5-4610 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Processor 300 vs Xeon E5-4610 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Processor 300 vs Xeon E5-4610 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Processor 300

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 46W instead of 105W, a 59W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4610 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4610 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $82 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4610 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4610 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+316.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,229 vs 7,264).
❌128.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 46W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Processor 300 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Processor 300 better than Xeon E5-4610 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4610 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Processor 300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor 300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Processor 300 is the better buy right now. Processor 300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $82 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4610 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 27.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor 300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2015), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 10/20. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Processor 300 vs Xeon E5-4610 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Processor 300

The Processor 300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,264 points. Launch price was $82.

Xeon E5-4610 v3

The Xeon E5-4610 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,229 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Processor 300 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-4610 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-4610 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Processor 300 versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 v3 — a 78.6% clock advantage for the Processor 300 (base: 3.9 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4610 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Processor 300 scores 7,264 against the Xeon E5-4610 v3's 7,229 — a 0.5% lead for the Processor 300. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4610 v3.

Feature	Processor 300	Xeon E5-4610 v3
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	10 / 20+400%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+129%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz+129%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+317%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	7,264	7,229

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor 300 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4610 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.