Core 3 N350 vs Processor 300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 3 N350 vs Processor 300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 3 N350 vs Processor 300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 3 N350

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 7W instead of 46W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,249 vs 7,264).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.2 vs 88.6 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).

Processor 300

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $143 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 175.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.6 vs 32.2 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 3 N350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌557.1% higher power demand at 46W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 3 N350 better than Processor 300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 3 N350 is ahead with a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Processor 300 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor 300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 3 N350 is still the faster CPU overall, but Processor 300 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core 3 N350 comes in 174.4% more expensive on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $82 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Processor 300 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. Processor 300 is also 175.0% better value on MSRP (88.6 vs 32.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 3 N350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 3 N350 vs Processor 300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 N350

The Core 3 N350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 7,249 points. Launch price was $149.

Processor 300

The Processor 300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,264 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 3 N350 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Processor 300 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core 3 N350 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N350 versus 3.9 GHz on the Processor 300 — identical boost frequencies (base: 0.1 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core 3 N350 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Processor 300 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N350 scores 7,249 against the Processor 300's 7,264 — a 0.2% lead for the Processor 300. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core 3 N350	Processor 300
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+300%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	0.1 GHz	3.9 GHz+3800%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+60%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Twin Lake (2024−2025)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	7,249	7,264

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 N350 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Processor 300 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 3 N350	Processor 300
Socket	FCBGA1264	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 3 N350 was priced at $225, while the Processor 300 came in at $82. On launch pricing ($225 vs $82), Processor 300 was $143 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 N350 delivers 32.2 pts/$ vs 88.6 pts/$ for the Processor 300 — making the Processor 300 the 93.3% better value option.

Feature	Core 3 N350	Processor 300
MSRP	$225	$82-64%
Performance per Dollar	32.2	88.6+175%
Release Date	2025	2024

Search Core 3 N350 on Amazon

Search Processor 300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.