Core 3 N350 vs Opteron 6281
Core 3 N350
Opteron 6281
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 3 N350 is positioned at rank 666 and the Opteron 6281 is on rank 44, so the Opteron 6281 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 3 N350
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6281
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 3 N350 | Opteron 6281 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($220) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($419) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Twin Lake (2024−2025) / Intel 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Interlagos (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 3 N350 | Opteron 6281 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+90%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($220) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($419) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 N350 and Opteron 6281
Core 3 N350
The Core 3 N350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 7,249 points. Launch price was $149.
Opteron 6281
The Opteron 6281 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $988.
Processing Power
The Core 3 N350 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6281 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6281 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N350 versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6281 — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Core 3 N350 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 3 N350 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Opteron 6281 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N350 scores 7,249 against the Opteron 6281's 7,279 — a 0.4% lead for the Opteron 6281. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N350 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6281.
| Feature | Core 3 N350 | Opteron 6281 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+22% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz+2400% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 2 MB (per module) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-78% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Twin Lake (2024−2025) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 7,249 | 7,279 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 3 N350 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Opteron 6281 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 3 N350 | Opteron 6281 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core 3 N350 launched at $225 MSRP, while the Opteron 6281 debuted at $988. At current prices ($220 vs $419), the Core 3 N350 is $199 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 N350 delivers 33.0 pts/$ vs 17.4 pts/$ for the Opteron 6281 — making the Core 3 N350 the 61.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core 3 N350 | Opteron 6281 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225-77% | $988 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $220-47% | $419 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.0+90% | 17.4 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 3 N350 and Opteron 6281
