Core 3 N350 vs Core i3-10100T

Intel

Core 3 N350

8 Cores8 Thrd7 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-10100T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2020

Core 3 N350 vs Core i3-10100T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 3 N350 vs Core i3-10100T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 3 N350 vs Core i3-10100T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 3 N350

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 7W instead of 35W, a 28W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (7,249 vs 7,305).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.2 vs 49.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Core i3-10100T

2020

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $76 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • Delivers 52.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.0 vs 32.2 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 3 N350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 400% higher power demand at 35W vs 7W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core 3 N350 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 3 N350 better than Core i3-10100T?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 3 N350 is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10100T pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10100T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 3 N350 is still the better call for a fresh build. Core 3 N350 comes in 51.0% more expensive on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-10100T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,305 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 3 N350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 3 N350 vs Core i3-10100T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 3 N350

The Core 3 N350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 7,249 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i3-10100T

The Core i3-10100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,305 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core 3 N350 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-10100T offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core 3 N350 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N350 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-10100T — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core 3 N350 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core 3 N350 is built on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 3 N350 scores 7,249 against the Core i3-10100T's 7,305 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-10100T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N350 vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-10100T.

FeatureCore 3 N350Core i3-10100T
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+3%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
0.1 GHz
3 GHz+2900%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Twin Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark
7,249
7,305
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 N350 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-10100T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 3 N350Core i3-10100T
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 3 N350 was priced at $225, while the Core i3-10100T came in at $149. On launch pricing ($225 vs $149), Core i3-10100T was $76 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 N350 delivers 32.2 pts/$ vs 49.0 pts/$ for the Core i3-10100T — making the Core i3-10100T the 41.4% better value option.

FeatureCore 3 N350Core i3-10100T
MSRP
$225
$149-34%
Performance per Dollar
32.2
49.0+52%
Release Date
2025
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.