Processor 300 vs Xeon Phi 7210

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Processor 300 vs Xeon Phi 7210 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Processor 300 vs Xeon Phi 7210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Processor 300

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,799 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $1,881 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2180.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.6 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $1,881 MSRP).
✅Draws 46W instead of 215W, a 169W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Phi 7210 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,264 vs 7,306).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7210, which brings 64 cores / 256 threads.

Xeon Phi 7210

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 256 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 88.6 PassMark/$ ($1,881 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
❌367.4% higher power demand at 215W vs 46W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Processor 300 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Phi 7210 better than Processor 300?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Phi 7210 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Processor 300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Phi 7210 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 24.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Phi 7210 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 256 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Phi 7210 is still the faster CPU overall, but Processor 300 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Phi 7210 comes in 2193.9% more expensive on MSRP at $1,881 MSRP versus $82 MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Processor 300 is also 2180.7% better value on MSRP (88.6 vs 3.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor 300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Processor 300 vs Xeon Phi 7210 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Processor 300

The Processor 300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,264 points. Launch price was $82.

Xeon Phi 7210

The Xeon Phi 7210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 64 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 215 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,306 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Processor 300 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7210 offers 64 cores / 256 threads — the Xeon Phi 7210 has 62 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Processor 300 versus 1.5 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7210 — a 88.9% clock advantage for the Processor 300 (base: 3.9 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Processor 300 scores 7,264 against the Xeon Phi 7210's 7,306 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Phi 7210. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300 vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7210.

Feature	Processor 300	Xeon Phi 7210
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	64 / 256+3100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+160%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz+200%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	0 kB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark	7,264	7,306

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor 300 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Processor 300	Xeon Phi 7210
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Processor 300 was priced at $82, while the Xeon Phi 7210 came in at $1881. On launch pricing ($82 vs $1881), Processor 300 was $1799 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor 300 delivers 88.6 pts/$ vs 3.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Phi 7210 — making the Processor 300 the 183.2% better value option.

Feature	Processor 300	Xeon Phi 7210
MSRP	$82-96%	$1881
Performance per Dollar	88.6+2172%	3.9
Release Date	2024	2016

Search Processor 300 on Amazon

Search Xeon Phi 7210 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.