Core i5-9300HF vs Processor 300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-9300HF vs Processor 300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-9300HF vs Processor 300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-9300HF

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 1W instead of 46W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,255 vs 7,264).
❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Processor 300 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Processor 300

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-9300HF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $82 MSRP, while Core i5-9300HF mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4500% higher power demand at 46W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Processor 300 better than Core i5-9300HF?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-9300HF is ahead with a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Processor 300 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i5-9300HF also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor 300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Processor 300 is the better buy right now. Processor 300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $82 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-9300HF is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor 300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-9300HF vs Processor 300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-9300HF

The Core i5-9300HF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,255 points. Launch price was $250.

Processor 300

The Processor 300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,264 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-9300HF packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Processor 300 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-9300HF has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-9300HF versus 3.9 GHz on the Processor 300 — a 5% clock advantage for the Core i5-9300HF (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-9300HF uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor 300 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9300HF scores 7,255 against the Processor 300's 7,264 — a 0.1% lead for the Processor 300. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i5-9300HF vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300.

Feature	Core i5-9300HF	Processor 300
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+5%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.9 GHz+63%
L3 Cache	8 MB+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	7,255	7,264
Geekbench 6 Single	1,288	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-9300HF uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor 300 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-9300HF	Processor 300
Socket	BGA1440	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-9300HF) / not specified (Processor 300). Primary use case: Core i5-9300HF targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-9300HF rivals Ryzen 5 3550H.