
Core i7-4790

Processor 300
Core i7-4790 vs Processor 300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4790 vs Processor 300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4790 vs Processor 300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4790
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,263 vs 7,264).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.4 vs 88.6 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
- ❌82.6% higher power demand at 84W vs 46W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1150, while Processor 300 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Processor 300
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $257 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 313.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.6 vs 21.4 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 46W instead of 84W, a 38W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1150 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4790 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Processor 300 better than Core i7-4790?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4790 vs Processor 300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4790
The Core i7-4790 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,263 points. Launch price was $303.

Processor 300
The Processor 300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,264 points. Launch price was $82.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4790 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Processor 300 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-4790 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-4790 versus 3.9 GHz on the Processor 300 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4790 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i7-4790 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Processor 300 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4790 scores 7,263 against the Processor 300's 7,264 — a 0% lead for the Processor 300. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4790 vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300.
| Feature | Core i7-4790 | Processor 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+3% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+20380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 7,263 | 7,264 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4790 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor 300 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4790 | Processor 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4790 was priced at $339, while the Processor 300 came in at $82. On launch pricing ($339 vs $82), Processor 300 was $257 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4790 delivers 21.4 pts/$ vs 88.6 pts/$ for the Processor 300 — making the Processor 300 the 122.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4790 | Processor 300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $339 | $82-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.4 | 88.6+314% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















