Core i7-4790 vs Opteron 6281

Core i7-4790 vs Opteron 6281 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4790

4 / 8

7,263

0.0%

7,279

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4790 vs Opteron 6281 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4790 vs Opteron 6281: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4790

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($339 MSRP vs $988 MSRP).
✅Delivers 190.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.4 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $988 MSRP).
✅Draws 84W instead of 130W, a 46W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,263 vs 7,279).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6281, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6281

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4790 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 21.4 PassMark/$ ($988 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
❌54.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 84W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4790 better than Opteron 6281?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6281 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4790 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6281 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4790 is the better buy right now. Core i7-4790 comes in $649 cheaper on MSRP at $339 MSRP versus $988 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Opteron 6281 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 190.8% better value on MSRP (21.4 vs 7.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4790 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4790 vs Opteron 6281 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4790

The Core i7-4790 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,263 points. Launch price was $303.

Opteron 6281

The Opteron 6281 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $988.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4790 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6281 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6281 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-4790 versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6281 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-4790 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-4790 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6281 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4790 scores 7,263 against the Opteron 6281's 7,279 — a 0.2% lead for the Opteron 6281. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4790	Opteron 6281
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+25%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+44%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per module)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark	7,263	7,279

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4790 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6281 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4790	Opteron 6281
Socket	LGA1150	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4790 was priced at $339, while the Opteron 6281 came in at $988. On launch pricing ($339 vs $988), Core i7-4790 was $649 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4790 delivers 21.4 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Opteron 6281 — making the Core i7-4790 the 97.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4790	Opteron 6281
MSRP	$339-66%	$988
Performance per Dollar	21.4+189%	7.4
Release Date	2014	2012

Search Core i7-4790 on Amazon

Search Opteron 6281 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.