Xeon E5-4610 vs Xeon Silver 4112

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4610 vs Xeon Silver 4112 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4610 vs Xeon Silver 4112: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4610

2012

Why buy it

✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8.3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,460 vs 6,536).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($1,219 MSRP vs $885 MSRP).
❌52.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 85W.

Xeon Silver 4112

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $334 less on MSRP ($885 MSRP vs $1,219 MSRP).
✅Delivers 39.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 5.3 PassMark/$ ($885 MSRP vs $1,219 MSRP).
✅Draws 85W instead of 130W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 15 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4112 better than Xeon E5-4610?

Yes. Xeon Silver 4112 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Silver 4112 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4112 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4112 is the better buy right now. Xeon Silver 4112 comes in $334 cheaper on MSRP at $885 MSRP versus $1,219 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 39.4% better value on MSRP (7.4 vs 5.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4112 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-4610 vs Xeon Silver 4112 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4610

The Xeon E5-4610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,460 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4112

The Xeon Silver 4112 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,536 points. Launch price was $473.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4610 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4112 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-4610 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4112 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4112 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-4610 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4112 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4610 scores 6,460 against the Xeon Silver 4112's 6,536 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Silver 4112. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4610 vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4112.

Feature	Xeon E5-4610	Xeon Silver 4112
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.6 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	15 MB (total)+82%	8.25 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4 MB+1500%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	6,460	6,536+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4610 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Silver 4112 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-4610	Xeon Silver 4112
Socket	LGA2011	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-4610 was priced at $1219, while the Xeon Silver 4112 came in at $885. On launch pricing ($1219 vs $885), Xeon Silver 4112 was $334 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-4610 delivers 5.3 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4112 — making the Xeon Silver 4112 the 32.9% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-4610	Xeon Silver 4112
MSRP	$1219	$885-27%
Performance per Dollar	5.3	7.4+40%
Release Date	2012	2017

Search Xeon E5-4610 on Amazon

Search Xeon Silver 4112 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.