Xeon E5-4620
VS
Ryzen Embedded R2514

Xeon E5-4620 vs Ryzen Embedded R2514

Intel

Xeon E5-4620

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R2514

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-4620 is positioned at rank #1013 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-4620

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
67040%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
12658%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
11246%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
8688%
#541
Xeon E5-4669 v4
MSRP: $7007|Avg: $300
81%
#1013
Xeon E5-4620
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $400
100%
#1014
Xeon E5-2680
MSRP: $3226|Avg: $40
93%
#1016
Xeon E5-4640
MSRP: $2725|Avg: N/A
83%
#1018
Xeon E5-4650
MSRP: $3616|Avg: $71
77%
#1019
Xeon E5-4655 v4
MSRP: $4616|Avg: N/A
76%
#1020
Xeon E5-4650L
MSRP: $3616|Avg: N/A
76%
#1021
Xeon E-2224
MSRP: $3226|Avg: $195
72%
#1022
Athlon MP 2400+
MSRP: $151|Avg: $20
65%
#1023
Xeon E5-2640 v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $530
60%
#1024
Xeon E5-2650L v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $1078
60%
#1025
Opteron 142
MSRP: $292|Avg: $20
49%
#1026
Athlon MP 2800+
MSRP: $275|Avg: $10
45%
#1027
Xeon L3110
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $950
43%
#1028
Xeon 2.66
MSRP: $337|Avg: $10
43%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R2514 (2022) utilizes 12 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-4620Ryzen Embedded R2514
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-4620 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-4620Ryzen Embedded R2514
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-4620 and Ryzen Embedded R2514

Intel

Xeon E5-4620

The Xeon E5-4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,635 points. Launch price was $400.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R2514

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,731 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4620 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-4620 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 — a 34.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2514 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-4620 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4620 scores 6,635 against the Ryzen Embedded R2514's 6,731 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R2514. L3 cache: 16384 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2514.

FeatureXeon E5-4620Ryzen Embedded R2514
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz+42%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+5%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
16384 kB (total)+300%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
12 nm-63%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark
6,635
6,731+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4620 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-4620Ryzen Embedded R2514
Socket
LGA2011
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%