Xeon E5-4660 v4 vs Xeon W-10885M

Intel

Xeon E5-4660 v4

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 3 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-10885M

8 Cores16 Thrd2 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-4660 v4 vs Xeon W-10885M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4660 v4 vs Xeon W-10885M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4660 v4 vs Xeon W-10885M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4660 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-10885M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (15,375 vs 15,486).
  • 5900% higher power demand at 120W vs 2W.

Xeon W-10885M

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 2W instead of 120W, a 118W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-10885M better than Xeon E5-4660 v4?
Yes. Xeon W-10885M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-10885M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-10885M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-10885M still makes the most sense overall. Xeon W-10885M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-10885M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-4660 v4 vs Xeon W-10885M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E5-4660 v4

The Xeon E5-4660 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,375 points. Launch price was $4,727.

Intel

Xeon W-10885M

The Xeon W-10885M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,486 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4660 v4 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-10885M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4660 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4660 v4 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-10885M — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10885M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-4660 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-10885M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4660 v4 scores 15,375 against the Xeon W-10885M's 15,486 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-10885M. L3 cache: 40 MB on the Xeon E5-4660 v4 vs 16 MB on the Xeon W-10885M.

FeatureXeon E5-4660 v4Xeon W-10885M
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3 GHz
5.1 GHz+70%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
40 MB+150%
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark
15,375
15,486
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4660 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-10885M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-4660 v4Xeon W-10885M
Socket
LGA2011
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%