Xeon E5205
VS
Celeron G1610T

Xeon E5205 vs Celeron G1610T

VS
Intel

Celeron G1610T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5205 is positioned at rank 952 and the Celeron G1610T is on rank 575, so the Celeron G1610T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5205

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
31346%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
5918%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5258%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4062%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
96%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
95%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
93%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
91%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
91%
#952
Xeon E5205
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#953
Xeon E5-1620
MSRP: $885|Avg: $70
100%
#955
Xeon E5462
MSRP: $342|Avg: $45
98%
#958
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
96%
#959
Xeon E5-1620 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
95%
#963
Xeon E5-2660
MSRP: $1329|Avg: $65
92%
#964
Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
91%
#966
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1610T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9821%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9280%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6738%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2030%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1608%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1407%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
806%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
795%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
724%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
724%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
716%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
696%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
687%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
684%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
678%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
97%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
100%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
99%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
99%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
99%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
98%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
98%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
98%
#584
Pentium G4520
MSRP: $86|Avg: $45
98%
#585
Core i3-4170
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
98%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
98%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
97%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
96%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5205 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5205Celeron G1610T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron G1610T ($42), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($42 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5205Celeron G1610T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5205 and Celeron G1610T

Intel

Xeon E5205

The Xeon E5205 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,325 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron G1610T

The Celeron G1610T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $89.

Processing Power

The Celeron G1610T is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5205 scores 1,325 against the Celeron G1610T's 1,333 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G1610T. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5205 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1610T.

FeatureXeon E5205Celeron G1610T
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
2.3 GHz+24%
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache+200%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,325
1,333
Geekbench 6 Single
393
Geekbench 6 Multi
674
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5205 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1610T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5205Celeron G1610T
Socket
LGA771
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5205) / VT-x (Celeron G1610T). The Celeron G1610T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Xeon E5205 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1610T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1610T rivals Pentium G2020T.

FeatureXeon E5205Celeron G1610T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget