
Xeon E5335 vs Turion X2 RM-70

Xeon E5335

Turion X2 RM-70
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5335 is positioned at rank 922 and the Turion X2 RM-70 is on rank 424, so the Turion X2 RM-70 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5335
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 RM-70
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5335 | Turion X2 RM-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clovertown (2006−2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5335 | Turion X2 RM-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5335 and Turion X2 RM-70

Xeon E5335
The Xeon E5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,549 points. Launch price was $800.

Turion X2 RM-70
The Turion X2 RM-70 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,556 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5335 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Turion X2 RM-70 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon E5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Xeon E5335 versus 2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-70 — identical boost frequencies. The Xeon E5335 uses the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-70 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5335 scores 1,549 against the Turion X2 RM-70's 1,556 — a 0.5% lead for the Turion X2 RM-70. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5335 vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-70.
| Feature | Xeon E5335 | Turion X2 RM-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+300% | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Clovertown (2006−2007) | Puma (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,549 | 1,556 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5335 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 RM-70 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5335 | Turion X2 RM-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA771 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















