Xeon E5502
VS
Athlon II X3 440

Xeon E5502 vs Athlon II X3 440

Intel

Xeon E5502

2 Cores2 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Athlon II X3 440

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 3 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5502 is positioned at rank 893 and the Athlon II X3 440 is on rank 722, so the Athlon II X3 440 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5502

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
22639%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4274%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3798%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2934%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
99%
#503
Xeon W-3275M
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $4449
99%
#504
Xeon E5-2660 v3
MSRP: $1445|Avg: $150
98%
#505
Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $500
97%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
93%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
92%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
91%
#893
Xeon E5502
MSRP: $188|Avg: $39
100%
#898
Xeon W-2225
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $150
97%
#899
Xeon E5-2650L v3
MSRP: $1329|Avg: N/A
97%
#906
Xeon E5405
MSRP: $209|Avg: $15
91%
#907
Xeon E5-2440
MSRP: $728|Avg: $249
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 440

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13413%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12674%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9202%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2772%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2196%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1921%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1100%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1086%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
989%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
989%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
978%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
951%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
938%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
934%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
926%
#722
Athlon II X3 440
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
100%
#723
Core i3-4130T
MSRP: $124|Avg: $10
100%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
99%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
99%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
99%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
98%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
98%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
98%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
98%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
97%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
97%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
97%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($39) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5502 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5502Athlon II X3 440
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Gainestown (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II X3 440 ($10), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($29 less, 74% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5502Athlon II X3 440
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+294%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5502 and Athlon II X3 440

Intel

Xeon E5502

The Xeon E5502 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,725 points. Launch price was $95.

AMD

Athlon II X3 440

The Athlon II X3 440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,743 points. Launch price was $47.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5502 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X3 440 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Athlon II X3 440 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Xeon E5502 versus 3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 440 — a 46.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 440 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon E5502 uses the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X3 440 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5502 scores 1,725 against the Athlon II X3 440's 1,743 — a 1% lead for the Athlon II X3 440. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5502 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 440.

FeatureXeon E5502Athlon II X3 440
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
1.87 GHz
3 GHz+60%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
3 GHz+61%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Gainestown (2009−2010)
Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,725
1,743+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5502 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X3 440 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-800 memory speed. The Xeon E5502 supports up to 144 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 127.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon E5502) vs 2 (Athlon II X3 440). PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon E5502) vs 0 (Athlon II X3 440) — the Xeon E5502 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 5500,Intel 5520,Intel X58 (Xeon E5502) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 440).

FeatureXeon E5502Athlon II X3 440
Socket
LGA1366
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
144 GB+350%
32 GB
RAM Channels
3+50%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
32
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Xeon E5502) / not specified (Athlon II X3 440).

FeatureXeon E5502Athlon II X3 440
Integrated GPU
No
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5502 launched at $188 MSRP, while the Athlon II X3 440 debuted at $75. At current prices ($39 vs $10), the Athlon II X3 440 is $29 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5502 delivers 44.2 pts/$ vs 174.3 pts/$ for the Athlon II X3 440 — making the Athlon II X3 440 the 119% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5502Athlon II X3 440
MSRP
$188
$75-60%
Avg Price (30d)
$39
$10-74%
Performance per Dollar
44.2
174.3+294%
Release Date
2009
2010