Xeon E5507
VS
Celeron G3900T

Xeon E5507 vs Celeron G3900T

Intel

Xeon E5507

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 0.27 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron G3900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5507 is positioned at rank 883 and the Celeron G3900T is on rank 451, so the Celeron G3900T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5507

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
21807%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4117%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3658%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2826%
#496
Xeon E7-8857 v2
MSRP: $3838|Avg: $2995
99%
#497
Xeon Gold 6148
MSRP: $3072|Avg: $290
99%
#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
98%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
97%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
97%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
97%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
96%
#503
Xeon W-3275M
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $4449
95%
#504
Xeon E5-2660 v3
MSRP: $1445|Avg: $150
95%
#883
Xeon E5507
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#886
Xeon X3460
MSRP: $316|Avg: $25
98%
#893
Xeon E5502
MSRP: $188|Avg: $39
96%
#898
Xeon W-2225
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $150
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6890%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6511%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4727%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1424%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1128%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
987%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
565%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
558%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
508%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
508%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
502%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
489%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
482%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
480%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
476%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
100%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
100%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
99%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
99%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
99%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
98%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
98%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
100%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
100%
#457
Celeron G3950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $30
99%
#462
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
98%
#466
Pentium G4600
MSRP: $82|Avg: $116
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5507 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5507Celeron G3900T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Gainestown (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron G3900T ($70), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($70 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5507Celeron G3900T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5507 and Celeron G3900T

Intel

Xeon E5507

The Xeon E5507 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $457.

Intel

Celeron G3900T

The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5507 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3900T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon E5507 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Xeon E5507 versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T — a 162.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900T (base: 2.26 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E5507 uses the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G3900T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5507 scores 1,905 against the Celeron G3900T's 1,900 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5507. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5507 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3900T.

FeatureXeon E5507Celeron G3900T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.27 GHz
2.6 GHz+863%
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
2.6 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+100%
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Gainestown (2009−2010)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
1,905
1,900
Geekbench 6 Single
514
Geekbench 6 Multi
903
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5507 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G3900T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5507Celeron G3900T
Socket
LGA1366
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5507) / VT-x (Celeron G3900T). The Celeron G3900T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Xeon E5507 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.

FeatureXeon E5507Celeron G3900T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget