Xeon E5603
VS
Core 2 Quad Q8300

Xeon E5603 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300

Intel

Xeon E5603

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8300

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5603 is positioned at rank 863 and the Core 2 Quad Q8300 is on rank 985, so the Xeon E5603 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5603

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
20197%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3813%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3388%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2617%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
100%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
99%
#488
EPYC 9534
MSRP: $8803|Avg: $2999
98%
#489
EPYC 9654
MSRP: $11805|Avg: $5345
98%
#490
EPYC 7H12
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $1340
97%
#491
EPYC 7742
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $800
97%
#492
Xeon Platinum 8352M
MSRP: $4471|Avg: $4471
97%
#493
Xeon Platinum 8570
MSRP: $9595|Avg: $9595
95%
#863
Xeon E5603
MSRP: $188|Avg: N/A
100%
#871
Xeon 6315P
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
98%
#877
Xeon X5687
MSRP: $552|Avg: $189
95%
#878
Xeon E5-2630 v4
MSRP: $1171|Avg: $130
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q8300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29105%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
27501%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
19968%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6016%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4765%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4168%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2387%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2356%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2145%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2145%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2121%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2064%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2035%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2027%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2009%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
95%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
100%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
99%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
99%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
98%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
97%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
96%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
96%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
95%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
95%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
94%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
94%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($188) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5603 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5603Core 2 Quad Q8300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($188)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 ($10), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($178 less, 95% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5603Core 2 Quad Q8300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1763%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($188)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5603 and Core 2 Quad Q8300

Intel

Xeon E5603

The Xeon E5603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,935 points. Launch price was $286.

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8300

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5603 and Core 2 Quad Q8300 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5603 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q8300 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon E5603 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5603 scores 1,935 against the Core 2 Quad Q8300's 1,917 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5603. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5603 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q8300.

FeatureXeon E5603Core 2 Quad Q8300
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz+56%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz+56%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4 MB (total)+1500%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark
1,935
1,917
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5603 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5603Core 2 Quad Q8300
Socket
LGA1366
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
288 GB
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
32
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5603) / not specified (Core 2 Quad Q8300). Primary use case: Xeon E5603 targets Server.

FeatureXeon E5603Core 2 Quad Q8300
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5603 launched at $188 MSRP, while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 debuted at $179.

FeatureXeon E5603Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP
$188
$179-5%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
Release Date
2011
2008