Xeon E5603
VS
Core i3-3220T

Xeon E5603 vs Core i3-3220T

Intel

Xeon E5603

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-3220T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5603 is positioned at rank 863 and the Core i3-3220T is on rank 939, so the Xeon E5603 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5603

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
20197%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3813%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3388%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2617%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
100%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
99%
#488
EPYC 9534
MSRP: $8803|Avg: $2999
98%
#489
EPYC 9654
MSRP: $11805|Avg: $5345
98%
#490
EPYC 7H12
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $1340
97%
#491
EPYC 7742
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $800
97%
#492
Xeon Platinum 8352M
MSRP: $4471|Avg: $4471
97%
#493
Xeon Platinum 8570
MSRP: $9595|Avg: $9595
95%
#863
Xeon E5603
MSRP: $188|Avg: N/A
100%
#871
Xeon 6315P
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
98%
#877
Xeon X5687
MSRP: $552|Avg: $189
95%
#878
Xeon E5-2630 v4
MSRP: $1171|Avg: $130
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3220T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23777%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22467%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16313%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4914%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3893%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3405%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1950%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1925%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1753%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1753%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1733%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1686%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1663%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1656%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1641%
#939
Core i3-3220T
MSRP: $149|Avg: $146
100%
#940
Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#941
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
100%
#942
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
100%
#943
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
99%
#946
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
98%
#947
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
97%
#948
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#949
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
96%
#950
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
96%
#951
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $150
96%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
96%
#954
Core i5-660
MSRP: $196|Avg: $150
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($188) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5603 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5603Core i3-3220T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($188)
More affordable ($146)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-3220T ($146), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($42 less, 22% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5603Core i3-3220T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+30%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($188)
More affordable ($146)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5603 and Core i3-3220T

Intel

Xeon E5603

The Xeon E5603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,935 points. Launch price was $286.

Intel

Core i3-3220T

The Core i3-3220T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,953 points. Launch price was $201.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5603 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3220T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5603 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5603 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-3220T — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-3220T (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5603 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-3220T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5603 scores 1,935 against the Core i3-3220T's 1,953 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-3220T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5603 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3220T.

FeatureXeon E5603Core i3-3220T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+75%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,935
1,953
Geekbench 6 Single
465
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5603 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3220T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Xeon E5603 supports up to 288 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 160% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon E5603) vs 2 (Core i3-3220T). PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon E5603) vs 16 (Core i3-3220T) — the Xeon E5603 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureXeon E5603Core i3-3220T
Socket
LGA1366
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
288 GB+800%
32 GB
RAM Channels
3+50%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
32+100%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5603) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3220T). The Core i3-3220T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Xeon E5603 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5603 targets Server, Core i3-3220T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-3220T rivals A8-5500.

FeatureXeon E5603Core i3-3220T
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Server
Low Power Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5603 launched at $188 MSRP, while the Core i3-3220T debuted at $149.

FeatureXeon E5603Core i3-3220T
MSRP
$188
$149-21%
Avg Price (30d)
$146
Release Date
2011
2012