Xeon E5607
VS
Core i7-9700K

Xeon E5607 vs Core i7-9700K

Intel

Xeon E5607

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 0.27 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5607 is positioned at rank #622 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5607

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
10443%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1972%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1752%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1353%
#371
Xeon 6730P
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
100%
#372
Xeon Gold 6330
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $2128
99%
#373
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
99%
#374
Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A
99%
#375
Xeon D-2766NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $212
99%
#376
Xeon Gold 6442Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
98%
#377
Xeon 6740P
MSRP: $4650|Avg: $4650
98%
#378
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
MSRP: $7999|Avg: $7999
97%
#379
Xeon W-3345
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $3319
97%
#380
Xeon Gold 6526Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
96%
#622
Xeon E5607
MSRP: $135|Avg: $27
100%
#626
Xeon Silver 4209T
MSRP: $563|Avg: $649
99%
#627
Xeon E3-1240
MSRP: $273|Avg: $39
99%
#636
Xeon E5-2680 v2
MSRP: $667|Avg: $462
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700K

#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
106%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
106%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
105%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
105%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
53%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
104%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
103%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
103%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
103%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
102%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
102%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
102%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
101%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
101%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
100%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
45%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
100%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
99%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
99%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
98%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
43%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
98%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
40%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
98%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
40%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
97%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
97%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
38%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-9700K (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5607Core i7-9700K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($27)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5607 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5607Core i7-9700K
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+38%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($27)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5607 and Core i7-9700K

Intel

Xeon E5607

The Xeon E5607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,686 points. Launch price was $135.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5607 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Xeon E5607 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 179.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 2.26 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E5607 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5607 scores 2,686 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 137.1% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E5607 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.

FeatureXeon E5607Core i7-9700K
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
0.27 GHz
4.9 GHz+1715%
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
3.6 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark
2,686
14,397+436%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5607 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5607Core i7-9700K
Socket
LGA1366
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5607) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5607 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

FeatureXeon E5607Core i7-9700K
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5607 launched at $135 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700K debuted at $385. At current prices ($27 vs $200), the Xeon E5607 is $173 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5607 delivers 99.5 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Xeon E5607 the 32.1% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5607Core i7-9700K
MSRP
$135-65%
$385
Avg Price (30d)
$27-87%
$200
Performance per Dollar
99.5+38%
72.0
Release Date
2011
2018