Xeon E5645
VS
Core i3-7350K

Xeon E5645 vs Core i3-7350K

Intel

Xeon E5645

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core i3-7350K

2 Cores4 Thrd60 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5645 is positioned at rank 669 and the Core i3-7350K is on rank 636, so the Core i3-7350K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5645

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12363%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2334%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2074%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1602%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
100%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#397
Xeon W-3235
MSRP: $1538|Avg: $1538
99%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
99%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
97%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
100%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
100%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
100%
#674
Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
99%
#677
Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $68
99%
#678
Xeon W5590
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
98%
#683
Xeon E5-1603 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $40
97%
#684
Xeon E3-1270
MSRP: $330|Avg: $178
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7350K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11418%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10789%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7834%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2360%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1869%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1635%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
937%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
924%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
842%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
842%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
832%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
810%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
798%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
795%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
788%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
100%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
100%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#640
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
99%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
99%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
99%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
98%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
98%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
98%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
97%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
97%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7350K (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5645Core i3-7350K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)
More affordable ($45)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5645 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5645Core i3-7350K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+546%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)
More affordable ($45)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5645 and Core i3-7350K

Intel

Xeon E5645

The Xeon E5645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,942 points. Launch price was $294.

Intel

Core i3-7350K

The Core i3-7350K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,886 points. Launch price was $179.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5645 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i3-7350K offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5645 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Xeon E5645 versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-7350K — a 44.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-7350K (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Xeon E5645 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-7350K uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5645 scores 4,942 against the Core i3-7350K's 4,886 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5645. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5645 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7350K.

FeatureXeon E5645Core i3-7350K
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+200%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.67 GHz
4.2 GHz+57%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
4.2 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+200%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,942+1%
4,886
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,100
Geekbench 6 Single
1,298
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,740
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5645 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-7350K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Xeon E5645 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7350K — the Core i3-7350K supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5645 supports up to 288 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 127.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon E5645) vs 2 (Core i3-7350K). PCIe lanes: 0 (Xeon E5645) vs 16 (Core i3-7350K) — the Core i3-7350K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureXeon E5645Core i3-7350K
Socket
LGA1366
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
288 GB+350%
64 GB
RAM Channels
3+50%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Xeon E5645) vs true (Core i3-7350K). The Core i3-7350K includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5645 targets Server.

FeatureXeon E5645Core i3-7350K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5645 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Core i3-7350K debuted at $179.

FeatureXeon E5645Core i3-7350K
MSRP
$294
$179-39%
Avg Price (30d)
$45
Release Date
2010
2017