Xeon E7-4890 v2
VS
Ryzen 9 3900

Xeon E7-4890 v2 vs Ryzen 9 3900

Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 3900

12 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E7-4890 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
403%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
3%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
8%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
7%
#3
Xeon E7-4890 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
7%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
6%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
76%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
68%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
52%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
52%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 3900

#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
1049%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
316%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
250%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
219%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
125%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
124%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
113%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
113%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
111%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
108%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
107%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
106%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
105%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
103%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
101%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
100%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
99%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
99%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
95%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
93%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
92%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
92%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
90%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
90%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
89%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
89%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
87%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
87%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
86%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
86%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 9 3900 (2019) utilizes 7 nm, 12 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E7-4890 v2Ryzen 9 3900
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E7-4890 v2Ryzen 9 3900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E7-4890 v2 and Ryzen 9 3900

Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Ryzen 9 3900

The Ryzen 9 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,588 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 packs 15 cores / 30 threads, while the Ryzen 9 3900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900 — a 23.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3900 is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7-4890 v2 scores 30,946 against the Ryzen 9 3900's 30,588 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E7-4890 v2. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 6,500 vs 17,700 (92.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 730 vs 1,713, a 80.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,500 vs 10,983 (66.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900). L3 cache: 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900.

FeatureXeon E7-4890 v2Ryzen 9 3900
Cores / Threads
15 / 30+25%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
4.3 GHz+26%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
37.5 MB
64 MB+71%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-68%
Architecture
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
30,946+1%
30,588
Cinebench R23 Multi
6,500
17,700+172%
Geekbench 6 Single
730
1,713+135%
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,500
10,983+100%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 3900 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900 — the Ryzen 9 3900 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 3900). PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 3900) — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) and X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900).

FeatureXeon E7-4890 v2Ryzen 9 3900
Socket
LGA2011
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-3200+33%
Max RAM Capacity
1536 GB+1100%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
32+33%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 3900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E7-4890 v2) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900). Primary use case: Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy), Ryzen 9 3900 targets Workstation Desktop (low power). Direct competitor: Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2; Ryzen 9 3900 rivals Core i9-9900.

FeatureXeon E7-4890 v2Ryzen 9 3900
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Enterprise Server (Legacy)
Workstation Desktop (low power)