Xeon E7-4890 v2 vs Xeon W-3245

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E7-4890 v2 vs Xeon W-3245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E7-4890 v2 vs Xeon W-3245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E7-4890 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+70.5% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Draws 155W instead of 205W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,500 vs 18,000).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3245

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 38 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,199 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌32.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3245 better than Xeon E7-4890 v2?

Yes. Xeon W-3245 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 176.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 0.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3245 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3245 is the stronger fit. You are getting 176.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3245 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3245 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $2,199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3245 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 15/30, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E7-4890 v2 vs Xeon W-3245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E7-4890 v2

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3245

The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 packs 15 cores / 30 threads, while the Xeon W-3245 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 — a 30% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3245 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon W-3245 is built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7-4890 v2 scores 30,946 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-3245. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 6,500 vs 18,000 (93.9% advantage for the Xeon W-3245). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 730 vs 1,353, a 59.8% lead for the Xeon W-3245 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,500 vs 11,698 (72.1% advantage for the Xeon W-3245). L3 cache: 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.

Feature	Xeon E7-4890 v2	Xeon W-3245
Cores / Threads	15 / 30	16 / 32+7%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4.6 GHz+35%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	37.5 MB+70%	22 MB
L2 Cache	—	16 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	—	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	30,946	31,089
Cinebench R23 Multi	6,500	18,000+177%
Geekbench 6 Single	730	1,353+85%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,500	11,698+113%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245 — the Xeon W-3245 supports 83.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) — the Xeon W-3245 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).

Feature	Xeon E7-4890 v2	Xeon W-3245
Socket	LGA2011	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2933+83%
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB+50%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	4	6+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	32	64+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3245 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy), Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2; Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.