Core Ultra 7 255H
VS
Xeon E7-4890 v2

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Xeon E7-4890 v2

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

16 Cores16 Thrd26 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 255H

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
112%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
110%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
106%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
104%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
102%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
102%
#181
Core Ultra 7 255H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
98%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
90%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E7-4890 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
403%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
3%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
8%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
7%
#3
Xeon E7-4890 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
7%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
6%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
76%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
68%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
52%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
52%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 255H (2025) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5-6400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Ultra 7 255HXeon E7-4890 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Ultra 7 255HXeon E7-4890 v2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255H and Xeon E7-4890 v2

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.

Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255H has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H is built on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the Xeon E7-4890 v2's 30,946 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E7-4890 v2. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 730, a 117.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 5,500 (96.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon E7-4890 v2
Cores / Threads
16 / 16+7%
15 / 30
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+50%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+57%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB
37.5 MB+56%
Process
5 nm-77%
22 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
30,932
30,946
Cinebench R23 Multi
6,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800+284%
730
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,700+185%
5,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — the Core Ultra 7 255H supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon E7-4890 v2
Socket
FCBGA2049
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400+67%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
32+14%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E7-4890 v2). The Core Ultra 7 255H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140T), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy). Direct competitor: Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon E7-4890 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-End Laptop
Enterprise Server (Legacy)