Core Ultra 7 255H
VS
Xeon W-3245

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Xeon W-3245

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

16 Cores16 Thrd26 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3245

16 Cores32 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 255H

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
112%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
110%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
106%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
104%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
102%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
102%
#181
Core Ultra 7 255H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
98%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
90%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3245

#417
EPYC 9474F
MSRP: $6780|Avg: $3723
107%
#418
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
MSRP: $11699|Avg: $11699
107%
#419
Xeon 6736P
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $3351
106%
#420
EPYC 9655P
MSRP: $10811|Avg: $7958
105%
#421
EPYC 9554P
MSRP: $7104|Avg: $3052
104%
#423
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP: $6499|Avg: $3444
103%
#424
Xeon W-2155
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $150
102%
#425
Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP: $3583|Avg: $2097
102%
#425
Xeon 6740E
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $3949
102%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
102%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
101%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
101%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
101%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
100%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
99%
#434
Xeon W-3225
MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850
98%
#435
Xeon Gold 6354
MSRP: $2878|Avg: $2898
97%
#436
Xeon Gold 5218T
MSRP: $1572|Avg: $1349
96%
#437
Xeon 6960P
MSRP: $9625|Avg: $9625
96%
#438
EPYC 9555
MSRP: $9826|Avg: $7973
96%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
95%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
95%
#441
EPYC 7F52
MSRP: $3100|Avg: $1826
94%
#442
EPYC 7542
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $899
94%
#443
EPYC 9655
MSRP: $11852|Avg: $11852
93%
#444
Xeon 6781P
MSRP: $8960|Avg: $8960
93%
#445
Xeon Gold 6338N
MSRP: $3200|Avg: $3200
93%
#446
Xeon Gold 5117
MSRP: $1286|Avg: $300
93%
#447
EPYC 73F3
MSRP: $3521|Avg: $2100
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 255H (2025) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5-6400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Ultra 7 255HXeon W-3245
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon W-3245 (2019) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2933, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Ultra 7 255HXeon W-3245
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255H and Xeon W-3245

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.

Intel

Xeon W-3245

The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, matching the Xeon W-3245's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3245 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-3245. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 1,353, a 69.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 11,698 (29.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon W-3245
Cores / Threads
16 / 16
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+11%
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+38%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB+9%
22 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
30,932
31,089
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800+107%
1,353
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,700+34%
11,698
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245 — the Core Ultra 7 255H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) — the Xeon W-3245 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon W-3245
Socket
FCBGA2049
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400+25%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
64+129%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3245 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245). The Core Ultra 7 255H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140T), while the Xeon W-3245 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon W-3245
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-End Laptop
Professional Workstation