Core Ultra 7 255H
EPYC 4245P
Core Ultra 7 255H vs EPYC 4245P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 255H vs EPYC 4245P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 255H vs EPYC 4245P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 255H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 65W, a 39W reduction.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
EPYC 4245P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (14,616 vs 15,700).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 65W vs 26W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 255H better than EPYC 4245P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 255H vs EPYC 4245P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 7 255H
The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.
EPYC 4245P
The EPYC 4245P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,135 points. Launch price was $239.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4245P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255H has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4245P — a 5.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4245P (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 4245P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the EPYC 4245P's 31,135 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 4245P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 3,347, a 17.8% lead for the EPYC 4245P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 14,616 (7.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4245P.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | EPYC 4245P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+13% | 3.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Grado (2025) |
| PassMark | 30,932 | 31,135 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800 | 3,347+20% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,700+7% | 14,616 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4245P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus DDR5-5600 on the EPYC 4245P — the Core Ultra 7 255H supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4245P supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 24 (EPYC 4245P) — the Core Ultra 7 255H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and AM5 platform (EPYC 4245P).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | EPYC 4245P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+14% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4245P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs AMD-V (EPYC 4245P). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc Graphics 140T (Core Ultra 7 255H) and Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2) (EPYC 4245P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, EPYC 4245P targets Entry-level Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4245P rivals Xeon E-2436.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | EPYC 4245P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-End Laptop | Entry-level Server / Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 255H and EPYC 4245P
