Core Ultra 7 255H
VS
Xeon 6507P

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Xeon 6507P

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

16 Cores16 Thrd26 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon 6507P

8 Cores16 Thrd150 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 255H

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
112%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
110%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
106%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
104%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
102%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
102%
#181
Core Ultra 7 255H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
98%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
90%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6507P

#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
109%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
109%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
108%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
107%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
104%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
104%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
104%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
104%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
103%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
101%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
100%
#256
Xeon 6507P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
99%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
99%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
97%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
97%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
96%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
96%
#266
EPYC 7C13
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
94%
#267
Xeon Gold 6336Y
MSRP: $3245|Avg: N/A
93%
#268
Xeon w5-2565X
MSRP: $1389|Avg: $1389
92%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
91%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
91%
#271
EPYC 7401
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $450
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 6507P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore Ultra 7 255HXeon 6507P
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 7 255H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore Ultra 7 255HXeon 6507P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255H and Xeon 6507P

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.

Intel

Xeon 6507P

The Xeon 6507P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 31,233 points. Launch price was $765.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6507P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6507P — a 17% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6507P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the Xeon 6507P's 31,233 — a 1% lead for the Xeon 6507P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,200, a 24% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 12,500 (22.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6507P.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon 6507P
Cores / Threads
16 / 16+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+19%
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+26%
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB
48 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm
Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark
30,932
31,233
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800+27%
2,200
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,700+26%
12,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6507P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6507P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 8 (Xeon 6507P). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 88 (Xeon 6507P) — the Xeon 6507P offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and Beechnut City platform (Xeon 6507P).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon 6507P
Socket
FCBGA2049
LGA4710
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
88+214%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6507P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6507P). The Core Ultra 7 255H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140T), while the Xeon 6507P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, Xeon 6507P targets Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6507P rivals EPYC 9004.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon 6507P
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-End Laptop
Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server