Core Ultra 7 255H
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Core Ultra 7 255H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 255H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 255H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 255H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 250W, a 224W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics 140T, while Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,241 vs 15,700).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,299 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌861.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 26W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 255H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 255H better than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 255H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 7 255H
The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,954 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX's 30,954 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 1,240, a 77.2% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 7,241 (73.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+21% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+47% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 64 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-58% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 30,932 | 30,954 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 29,045 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800+126% | 1,240 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,700+117% | 7,241 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — the Core Ultra 7 255H supports 118.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+118% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). The Core Ultra 7 255H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140T), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX targets Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX rivals Core i9-7940X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-End Laptop | Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 255H and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
