Core Ultra 7 255H
VS
Xeon Platinum 8260

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Xeon Platinum 8260

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

16 Cores16 Thrd26 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8260

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 255H

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
112%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
110%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
106%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
104%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
102%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
102%
#181
Core Ultra 7 255H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
98%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
90%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8260

#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
113%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
110%
#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
96%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
96%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 255H (2025) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5-6400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Ultra 7 255HXeon Platinum 8260
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Platinum 8260 (2019) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2933, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Ultra 7 255HXeon Platinum 8260
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255H and Xeon Platinum 8260

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8260

The Xeon Platinum 8260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,720 points. Launch price was $4,702.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the Xeon Platinum 8260's 30,720 — a 0.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 1,190, a 80.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 6,946 (77.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8260.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon Platinum 8260
Cores / Threads
16 / 16
24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+31%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+83%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB
35.75 MB (total)+49%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark
30,932
30,720
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800+135%
1,190
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,700+126%
6,946
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8260 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260 — the Core Ultra 7 255H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8260 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8260) — the Xeon Platinum 8260 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8260).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon Platinum 8260
Socket
FCBGA2049
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400+25%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
48+71%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8260 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8260). The Core Ultra 7 255H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140T), while the Xeon Platinum 8260 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, Xeon Platinum 8260 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8260 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon Platinum 8260
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-End Laptop
Server / Workstation