Core Ultra 7 255H
VS
Xeon Silver 4514Y

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Xeon Silver 4514Y

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

16 Cores16 Thrd26 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4514Y

16 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 255H

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
112%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
110%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
106%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
104%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
102%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
102%
#181
Core Ultra 7 255H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
98%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
90%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Silver 4514Y

#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
108%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
108%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
108%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
108%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
107%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
105%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
104%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
103%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
103%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
101%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
101%
#262
Xeon Silver 4514Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
100%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
99%
#266
EPYC 7C13
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
97%
#267
Xeon Gold 6336Y
MSRP: $3245|Avg: N/A
97%
#268
Xeon w5-2565X
MSRP: $1389|Avg: $1389
96%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
95%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
94%
#271
EPYC 7401
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $450
94%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
92%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
91%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Silver 4514Y is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore Ultra 7 255HXeon Silver 4514Y
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Emerald Rapids (2023) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 7 255H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore Ultra 7 255HXeon Silver 4514Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255H and Xeon Silver 4514Y

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4514Y

The Xeon Silver 4514Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,621 points. Launch price was $780.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, matching the Xeon Silver 4514Y's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4514Y — a 40% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4514Y uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the Xeon Silver 4514Y's 30,621 — a 1% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,100, a 28.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 14,000 (11.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4514Y.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon Silver 4514Y
Cores / Threads
16 / 16
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+50%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+120%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB
30 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark
30,932+1%
30,621
Cinebench R23 Multi
22,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800+33%
2,100
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,700+12%
14,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4514Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon Silver 4514Y supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4514Y). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4514Y) — the Xeon Silver 4514Y offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4514Y).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon Silver 4514Y
Socket
FCBGA2049
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
DDR5-4400
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
80+186%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Silver 4514Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4514Y). The Core Ultra 7 255H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140T), while the Xeon Silver 4514Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, Xeon Silver 4514Y targets Mainstream Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4514Y rivals EPYC 8212.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXeon Silver 4514Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-End Laptop
Mainstream Server / Virtualization