Core Ultra 7 255H vs Ryzen 9 3900
Core Ultra 7 255H
Ryzen 9 3900
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 255H
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 3900
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255H and Ryzen 9 3900
Core Ultra 7 255H
The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.
Ryzen 9 3900
The Ryzen 9 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,588 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 3900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900 — a 17% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 3900 uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the Ryzen 9 3900's 30,588 — a 1.1% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 1,713, a 48.2% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 10,983 (35.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+19% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+42% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 64 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | — | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,932+1% | 30,588 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800+63% | 1,713 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,700+43% | 10,983 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 3900 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900 — the Core Ultra 7 255H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 3900) — the Core Ultra 7 255H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 3900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900). The Core Ultra 7 255H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140T), while the Ryzen 9 3900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, Ryzen 9 3900 targets Workstation Desktop (low power). Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 3900 rivals Core i9-9900.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-End Laptop | Workstation Desktop (low power) |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 255H and Ryzen 9 3900
