Core Ultra 7 255H
VS
Core Ultra 5 225

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Core Ultra 5 225

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

16 Cores16 Thrd26 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 225

10 Cores10 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 255H

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
112%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
110%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
106%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
104%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
102%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
102%
#181
Core Ultra 7 255H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
98%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
90%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 225

#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
106%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
105%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
104%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
104%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
104%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
103%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
103%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
103%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
102%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
102%
#46
Core i5-13490F
MSRP: $235|Avg: $170
101%
#47
Ryzen 5 5600F
MSRP: $99|Avg: $129
101%
#48
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
100%
#49
Ryzen 3 4300GE
MSRP: $94|Avg: $72
100%
#50
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
100%
#51
Core Ultra 5 225
MSRP: $240|Avg: $200
100%
#52
Core i5-11500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $110
100%
#53
Core i3-12100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $90
100%
#54
Core Ultra 7 265
MSRP: $384|Avg: $320
100%
#55
Ryzen 7 5800X
MSRP: $449|Avg: $180
99%
#56
Core i5-11400F
MSRP: $157|Avg: $110
99%
#57
Ryzen 7 5700G
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
98%
#58
Ryzen 7 5700X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $175
98%
#59
Core i5-9500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $65
97%
#60
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
96%
#61
Core i9-9960X
MSRP: $1684|Avg: $200
96%
#62
Core Ultra 5 225T
MSRP: $240|Avg: $180
96%
#63
Ryzen 3 3300X
MSRP: $120|Avg: $90
96%
#64
Core i5-12600K
MSRP: $289|Avg: $185
96%
#65
Core Ultra 5 235
MSRP: $257|Avg: $269
95%
#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 7 255H leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Ultra 5 225 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Ultra 7 255HCore Ultra 5 225
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 7 255HCore Ultra 5 225
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255H and Core Ultra 5 225

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225

The Core Ultra 5 225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,137 points. Launch price was $246.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225 offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225 — a 4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the Core Ultra 5 225's 31,137 — a 0.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,653, a 5.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 13,028 (18.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HCore Ultra 5 225
Cores / Threads
16 / 16+60%
10 / 10
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+4%
4.9 GHz
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+33%
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB+20%
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm
3 nm-40%
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark
30,932
31,137
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,020
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800+6%
2,653
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,700+21%
13,028
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225) — the Core Ultra 7 255H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 5 225).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HCore Ultra 5 225
Socket
FCBGA2049
LGA1851
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
256 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28+17%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 225). Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc Graphics 140T (Core Ultra 7 255H) and Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 5 225) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, Core Ultra 5 225 targets Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HCore Ultra 5 225
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-End Laptop
Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency