EPYC 4245P vs Xeon E7-4890 v2

AMD

EPYC 4245P

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 4245P vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4245P vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4245P vs Xeon E7-4890 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4245P

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
  • Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2), while Xeon E7-4890 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E7-4890 v2

2014

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4245P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,500 vs 12,000).
  • 138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2011, while EPYC 4245P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4245P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4245P better than Xeon E7-4890 v2?
Yes. EPYC 4245P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 84.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 0.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4245P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4245P is the stronger fit. You are getting 84.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4245P still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 4245P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4245P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2014), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 15/30, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4245P vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4245P

The EPYC 4245P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,135 points. Launch price was $239.

Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4245P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4245P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — a 45.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4245P (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 4245P is built on the Grado (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 4245P scores 31,135 against the Xeon E7-4890 v2's 30,946 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 4245P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,000 vs 6,500 (59.5% advantage for the EPYC 4245P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,347 vs 730, a 128.4% lead for the EPYC 4245P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,616 vs 5,500 (90.6% advantage for the EPYC 4245P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4245P vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2.

FeatureEPYC 4245PXeon E7-4890 v2
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
15 / 30+150%
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+59%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.9 GHz+39%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
37.5 MB+17%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-82%
22 nm
Architecture
Grado (2025)
PassMark
31,135
30,946
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,000+85%
6,500
Geekbench 6 Single
3,347+358%
730
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,616+166%
5,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4245P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the EPYC 4245P versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — the EPYC 4245P supports 250% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4245P) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2). PCIe lanes: 24 (EPYC 4245P) vs 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 platform (EPYC 4245P) and C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2).

FeatureEPYC 4245PXeon E7-4890 v2
Socket
AM5
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+250%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
1536 GB+500%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
32+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4245P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 4245P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E7-4890 v2). The EPYC 4245P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4245P targets Entry-level Server / Workstation, Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy). Direct competitor: EPYC 4245P rivals Xeon E-2436; Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2.

FeatureEPYC 4245PXeon E7-4890 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Entry-level Server / Workstation
Enterprise Server (Legacy)