EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen 7 8700F

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4245P

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 8700F

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Ryzen family

······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen 7 8700F Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4245P

6 / 12

31,135

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen 7 8700F

8 / 16

31,240

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen 7 8700F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen 7 8700F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4245P

2025

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 24 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2), while Ryzen 7 8700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,000 vs 18,040).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Spire), unlike EPYC 4245P.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4245P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 24 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $270 MSRP, while EPYC 4245P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4245P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than EPYC 4245P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4245P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8700F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 8700F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8700F is the stronger fit. You are getting 50.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8700F is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 8700F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $270 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (115.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4245P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen 7 8700F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4245P

The EPYC 4245P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,135 points. Launch price was $239.

Ryzen 7 8700F

The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4245P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8700F offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 8700F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4245P versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F — a 7.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4245P (base: 3.9 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The EPYC 4245P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8700F uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4245P scores 31,135 against the Ryzen 7 8700F's 31,240 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,000 vs 18,040 (40.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,347 vs 2,649, a 23.3% lead for the EPYC 4245P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,616 vs 13,500 (7.9% advantage for the EPYC 4245P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4245P vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F.

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Ryzen 7 8700F
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+8%	5 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz	4.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark	31,135	31,240
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,000	18,040+50%
Geekbench 6 Single	3,347+26%	2,649
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,616+8%	13,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the EPYC 4245P versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F — the EPYC 4245P supports 7.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (EPYC 4245P) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) — the EPYC 4245P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 platform (EPYC 4245P) and XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F).

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Ryzen 7 8700F
Socket	AM5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+8%	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	256 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 8700F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The EPYC 4245P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)), while the Ryzen 7 8700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4245P targets Entry-level Server / Workstation, Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4245P rivals Xeon E-2436; Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F.

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Ryzen 7 8700F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	Entry-level Server / Workstation	High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU