EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4245P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 24 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,000 vs 16,500).
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4245P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 24 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 better than EPYC 4245P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4245P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is the stronger fit. You are getting 37.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4245P

The EPYC 4245P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,135 points. Launch price was $239.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4245P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4245P versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — a 7.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4245P (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 4245P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4245P scores 31,135 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,000 vs 16,500 (31.6% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,347 vs 2,886, a 14.8% lead for the EPYC 4245P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,616 vs 14,136 (3.3% advantage for the EPYC 4245P). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+8%	5 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz+8%	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	31,135	31,508+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,000	16,500+38%
Geekbench 6 Single	3,347+16%	2,886
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,616+3%	14,136

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4245P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the EPYC 4245P versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4245P supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4245P) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). PCIe lanes: 24 (EPYC 4245P) vs 20 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) — the EPYC 4245P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 platform (EPYC 4245P) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Socket	AM5	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	LPDDR5x-8000+43%
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2) (EPYC 4245P) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4245P targets Entry-level Server / Workstation, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: EPYC 4245P rivals Xeon E-2436; Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)	Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	Entry-level Server / Workstation	Enterprise AI Mobile