EPYC 4245P
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4245P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2), while Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,000 vs 29,045).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,299 MSRP, while EPYC 4245P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4245P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4245P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX better than EPYC 4245P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4245P
The EPYC 4245P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,135 points. Launch price was $239.
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,954 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4245P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4245P versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — a 25% clock advantage for the EPYC 4245P (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 4245P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4245P scores 31,135 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX's 30,954 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 4245P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,000 vs 29,045 (83.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,347 vs 1,240, a 91.9% lead for the EPYC 4245P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,616 vs 7,241 (67.5% advantage for the EPYC 4245P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4245P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
| Feature | EPYC 4245P | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 24 / 48+300% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+29% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+30% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 4 nm-67% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 31,135 | 30,954 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,000 | 29,045+142% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,347+170% | 1,240 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,616+102% | 7,241 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4245P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the EPYC 4245P versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — the EPYC 4245P supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4245P) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (EPYC 4245P) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 platform (EPYC 4245P) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX).
| Feature | EPYC 4245P | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+91% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 2048 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4245P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The EPYC 4245P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4245P targets Entry-level Server / Workstation, Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX targets Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4245P rivals Xeon E-2436; Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX rivals Core i9-7940X.
| Feature | EPYC 4245P | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2) | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry-level Server / Workstation | Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4245P and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
