EPYC 4245P vs Xeon 6507P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4245P

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6507P

8 Cores16 Thrd150 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4245P vs Xeon 6507P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4245P

6 / 12

31,135

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Xeon 6507P

8 / 16

31,233

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4245P vs Xeon 6507P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4245P vs Xeon 6507P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4245P

2025

Why buy it

✅+52.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2), while Xeon 6507P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,000 vs 18,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).

Xeon 6507P

2025

Why buy it

✅+50% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,200 vs 3,347).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4245P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6507P better than EPYC 4245P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4245P is ahead with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6507P pulls ahead with 50% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Xeon 6507P also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6507P is the stronger fit. You are getting 50% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6507P still makes the most sense overall. Xeon 6507P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 50% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6507P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 4245P vs Xeon 6507P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4245P

The EPYC 4245P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,135 points. Launch price was $239.

Xeon 6507P

The Xeon 6507P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 31,233 points. Launch price was $765.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4245P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon 6507P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon 6507P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4245P versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6507P — a 22.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4245P (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 4245P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6507P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4245P scores 31,135 against the Xeon 6507P's 31,233 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon 6507P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,000 vs 18,000 (40% advantage for the Xeon 6507P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,347 vs 2,200, a 41.4% lead for the EPYC 4245P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,616 vs 12,500 (15.6% advantage for the EPYC 4245P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4245P vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6507P.

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Xeon 6507P
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+26%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz+11%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	48 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	31,135	31,233
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,000	18,000+50%
Geekbench 6 Single	3,347+52%	2,200
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,616+17%	12,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4245P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6507P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the EPYC 4245P versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6507P — the Xeon 6507P supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6507P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4245P) vs 8 (Xeon 6507P). PCIe lanes: 24 (EPYC 4245P) vs 88 (Xeon 6507P) — the Xeon 6507P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 platform (EPYC 4245P) and Beechnut City platform (Xeon 6507P).

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Xeon 6507P
Socket	AM5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	4096 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	88+267%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 4245P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6507P). The EPYC 4245P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)), while the Xeon 6507P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4245P targets Entry-level Server / Workstation, Xeon 6507P targets Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4245P rivals Xeon E-2436; Xeon 6507P rivals EPYC 9004.

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Xeon 6507P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Entry-level Server / Workstation	Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server