
Xeon 6507P
Popular choices:

Xeon E7-4890 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6507P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 38 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 155W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
- ✅175% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon E7-4890 v2
2014Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6507P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,500 vs 18,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 48 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Xeon 6507P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6507P
2025Xeon E7-4890 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 38 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 155W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
- ✅175% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6507P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,500 vs 18,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 48 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Xeon 6507P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6507P better than Xeon E7-4890 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6507P | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6507P | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6507P | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 781 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 781 FPS | 774 FPS |
| high | 781 FPS | 763 FPS |
| ultra | 781 FPS | 679 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 781 FPS | 744 FPS |
| medium | 756 FPS | 638 FPS |
| high | 698 FPS | 605 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6507P | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 781 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 781 FPS | 774 FPS |
| high | 781 FPS | 765 FPS |
| ultra | 753 FPS | 648 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 781 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 778 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 667 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 377 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6507P and Xeon E7-4890 v2

Xeon 6507P
Xeon 6507P
The Xeon 6507P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 31,233 points. Launch price was $765.

Xeon E7-4890 v2
Xeon E7-4890 v2
The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6507P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6507P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — a 23.4% clock advantage for the Xeon 6507P (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon 6507P is built on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon 6507P scores 31,233 against the Xeon E7-4890 v2's 30,946 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon 6507P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 6,500 (93.9% advantage for the Xeon 6507P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,200 vs 730, a 100.3% lead for the Xeon 6507P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,500 vs 5,500 (77.8% advantage for the Xeon 6507P). L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6507P vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2.
| Feature | Xeon 6507P | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 15 / 30+88% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+26% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+25% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB (total)+28% | 37.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-86% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 31,233 | 30,946 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,000+177% | 6,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,200+201% | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,500+127% | 5,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6507P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6507P versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — the Xeon 6507P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6507P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1536 GB — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6507P) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6507P) vs 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) — the Xeon 6507P offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Beechnut City platform (Xeon 6507P) and C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2).
| Feature | Xeon 6507P | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+67% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+167% | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+175% | 32 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6507P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6507P targets Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server, Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy). Direct competitor: Xeon 6507P rivals EPYC 9004; Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2.
| Feature | Xeon 6507P | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server | Enterprise Server (Legacy) |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













