
Xeon 6507P

Xeon E-2488
Xeon 6507P vs Xeon E-2488 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon 6507P vs Xeon E-2488 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon 6507P vs Xeon E-2488: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon 6507P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 95W.
Xeon E-2488
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 150W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6507P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 18,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 48 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6507P better than Xeon E-2488?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6507P vs Xeon E-2488 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6507P
The Xeon 6507P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 31,233 points. Launch price was $765.

Xeon E-2488
The Xeon E-2488 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 31,888 points. Launch price was $606.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon 6507P and Xeon E-2488 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6507P versus 5.6 GHz on the Xeon E-2488 — a 26.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2488 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon 6507P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon E-2488 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6507P scores 31,233 against the Xeon E-2488's 31,888 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon E-2488. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 15,000 (18.2% advantage for the Xeon 6507P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,200 vs 2,100, a 4.7% lead for the Xeon 6507P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,500 vs 12,000 (4.1% advantage for the Xeon 6507P). L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6507P vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2488.
| Feature | Xeon 6507P | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5.6 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB (total)+100% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 31,233 | 31,888+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,000+20% | 15,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,200+5% | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,500+4% | 12,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6507P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2488 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6507P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon E-2488 — the Xeon 6507P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6507P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6507P) vs 2 (Xeon E-2488). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6507P) vs 20 (Xeon E-2488) — the Xeon 6507P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Beechnut City platform (Xeon 6507P) and W680 (Xeon E-2488).
| Feature | Xeon 6507P | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+33% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+340% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6507P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6507P targets Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server, Xeon E-2488 targets Entry-level Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon 6507P rivals EPYC 9004; Xeon E-2488 rivals Xeon E-2388G.
| Feature | Xeon 6507P | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server | Entry-level Server / Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














