
Core i5-14500

Xeon 6507P
Core i5-14500 vs Xeon 6507P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-14500 vs Xeon 6507P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-14500 vs Xeon 6507P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-14500
2024Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6507P needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Xeon 6507P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6507P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 48 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6507P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $239 MSRP, while Xeon 6507P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon 6507P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,500 vs 15,000).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-14500.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14500 better than Xeon 6507P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14500 vs Xeon 6507P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14500
The Core i5-14500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,205 points. Launch price was $232.

Xeon 6507P
The Xeon 6507P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 31,233 points. Launch price was $765.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14500 packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon 6507P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14500 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-14500 versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6507P — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-14500 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-14500 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6507P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14500 scores 31,205 against the Xeon 6507P's 31,233 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon 6507P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 2,200, a 20.4% lead for the Core i5-14500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 12,500 (18.2% advantage for the Core i5-14500). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14500 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6507P.
| Feature | Core i5-14500 | Xeon 6507P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+16% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 48 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 31,205 | 31,233 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700+23% | 2,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000+20% | 12,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14500 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6507P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-14500 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6507P — the Xeon 6507P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6507P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-14500) vs 8 (Xeon 6507P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-14500) vs 88 (Xeon 6507P) — the Xeon 6507P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B760,Z790 (Core i5-14500) and Beechnut City platform (Xeon 6507P).
| Feature | Core i5-14500 | Xeon 6507P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 88+340% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6507P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14500) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6507P). The Core i5-14500 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon 6507P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14500 targets Mainstream Desktop, Xeon 6507P targets Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6507P rivals EPYC 9004.
| Feature | Core i5-14500 | Xeon 6507P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | Next-gen Cloud / Enterprise Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














