PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-14500 vs Xeon W-3245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-14500 vs Xeon W-3245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-14500

2024

Why buy it

✅+28.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $1,960 less on MSRP ($239 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 823.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 130.6 vs 14.1 PassMark/$ ($239 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3245

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,698 vs 15,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.1 vs 130.6 PassMark/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-14500 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-14500 better than Xeon W-3245?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3245 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-14500 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-14500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 28.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-14500 is the better buy right now. Core i5-14500 comes in $1,960 cheaper on MSRP at $239 MSRP versus $2,199 MSRP, and it still gives you 28.2% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Xeon W-3245 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 823.5% better value on MSRP (130.6 vs 14.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-14500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-14500 vs Xeon W-3245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14500

The Core i5-14500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,205 points. Launch price was $232.

Xeon W-3245

The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-14500 packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-3245 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-14500 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-14500 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-14500 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3245 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14500 scores 31,205 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-14500. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 1,353, a 66.5% lead for the Core i5-14500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 11,698 (24.7% advantage for the Core i5-14500). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14500 vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.

Feature	Core i5-14500	Xeon W-3245
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+9%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+9%	22 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	16 MB+1180%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	31,205	31,089
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,700+100%	1,353
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,000+28%	11,698

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-14500 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-14500 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245 — the Core i5-14500 supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-14500) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-14500) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) — the Xeon W-3245 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B760,Z790 (Core i5-14500) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).

Feature	Core i5-14500	Xeon W-3245
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+64%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	1024 GB+433%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3245 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14500) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245). The Core i5-14500 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3245 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14500 targets Mainstream Desktop, Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Core i5-14500	Xeon W-3245
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Mainstream Desktop	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-14500 was priced at $239, while the Xeon W-3245 came in at $2199. On launch pricing ($239 vs $2199), Core i5-14500 was $1960 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14500 delivers 130.6 pts/$ vs 14.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245 — making the Core i5-14500 the 160.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-14500	Xeon W-3245
MSRP	$239-89%	$2199
Performance per Dollar	130.6+826%	14.1
Release Date	2024	2019

Search Core i5-14500 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3245 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.