Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon E7-4890 v2

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

8 / 16

30,689

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Xeon E7-4890 v2

15 / 30

30,946

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon E7-4890 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 155W, a 110W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 38 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4890 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E7-4890 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,500 vs 16,529).
❌244.4% higher power demand at 155W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS better than Xeon E7-4890 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-4890 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 154.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 15/30, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,689 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon E7-4890 v2

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — a 41.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (base: 4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is built on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 30,689 against the Xeon E7-4890 v2's 30,946 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E7-4890 v2. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,529 vs 6,500 (87.1% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,617 vs 730, a 112.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,098 vs 5,500 (81.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS	Xeon E7-4890 v2
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	15 / 30+88%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+53%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+43%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	37.5 MB+134%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm-82%	22 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	30,689	30,946
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,529+154%	6,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,617+258%	730
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,098+138%	5,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS supports 250% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) vs 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) and C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2).

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS	Xeon E7-4890 v2
Socket	FP7	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+250%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1536 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	32+60%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E7-4890 v2). The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS targets Professional AI Business Laptop, Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy). Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS rivals Core Ultra 9 185H; Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS	Xeon E7-4890 v2
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 780M	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Professional AI Business Laptop	Enterprise Server (Legacy)