Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon W-2295

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon W-2295 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

8 / 16

30,689

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Xeon W-2295

18 / 36

30,986

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon W-2295 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon W-2295: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 165W, a 120W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-2295 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2295, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-2295

2019

Why buy it

✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,863 vs 13,098).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,333 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌266.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS better than Xeon W-2295?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2295 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-2295 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,333 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-2295 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 18/36. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon W-2295 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,689 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon W-2295

The Xeon W-2295 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,986 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2295 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2295 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2295 — a 8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (base: 4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is built on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 30,689 against the Xeon W-2295's 30,986 — a 1% lead for the Xeon W-2295. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,617 vs 1,703, a 42.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,098 vs 12,863 (1.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon W-2295.

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS	Xeon W-2295
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+8%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+33%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	24.75 MB+55%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	30,689	30,986
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,529	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,617+54%	1,703
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,098+2%	12,863

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2295 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2295 — the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2295 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) vs 4 (Xeon W-2295). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) vs 48 (Xeon W-2295) — the Xeon W-2295 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) and C422 (Xeon W-2295).

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS	Xeon W-2295
Socket	FP7	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+91%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1024 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2295). The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon W-2295 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS targets Professional AI Business Laptop, Xeon W-2295 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS	Xeon W-2295
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 780M	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Professional AI Business Laptop	Workstation