
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Xeon W-3245
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon W-3245 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon W-3245 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon W-3245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
2024Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 45W instead of 205W, a 160W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-3245 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,529 vs 18,000).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3245
2019Why buy it
- β +8.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β +37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- β 220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $2,199 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β355.6% higher power demand at 205W vs 45W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS better than Xeon W-3245?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon W-3245 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023β2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,689 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon W-3245
The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3245 offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Xeon W-3245 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 β a 12.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (base: 4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023β2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3245 uses Cascade Lake (2019β2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 30,689 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 β a 1.3% lead for the Xeon W-3245. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,529 vs 18,000 (8.5% advantage for the Xeon W-3245). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,617 vs 1,353, a 63.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,098 vs 11,698 (11.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+13% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+25% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 22 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 16 MB+1500% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023β2024) | Cascade Lake (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 30,689 | 31,089+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,529 | 18,000+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,617+93% | 1,353 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,098+12% | 11,698 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245 β the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) β the Xeon W-3245 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+91% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 1024 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245). The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon W-3245 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS targets Professional AI Business Laptop, Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS rivals Core Ultra 9 185H; Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Professional AI Business Laptop | Professional Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













