EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4245P

2025

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 24 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,000 vs 16,529).
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4245P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 24 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS better than EPYC 4245P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4245P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 37.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4245P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 4245P vs Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4245P

The EPYC 4245P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,135 points. Launch price was $239.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,689 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4245P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4245P versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS — a 3.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4245P (base: 3.9 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 4245P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4245P scores 31,135 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS's 30,689 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 4245P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,000 vs 16,529 (31.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,347 vs 2,617, a 24.5% lead for the EPYC 4245P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,616 vs 13,098 (11% advantage for the EPYC 4245P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4245P vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+4%	5.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz	4 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark	31,135+1%	30,689
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,000	16,529+38%
Geekbench 6 Single	3,347+28%	2,617
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,616+12%	13,098

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4245P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (EPYC 4245P) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) — the EPYC 4245P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 platform (EPYC 4245P) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS).

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
Socket	AM5	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	256 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 4245P) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2) (EPYC 4245P) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4245P targets Entry-level Server / Workstation, Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS targets Professional AI Business Laptop. Direct competitor: EPYC 4245P rivals Xeon E-2436; Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.

Feature	EPYC 4245P	Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)	Radeon 780M
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V, SVM
Target Use	Entry-level Server / Workstation	Professional AI Business Laptop