Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon E7-4890 v2

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 7 8700F

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Ryzen family

······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E7-4890 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 8700F

8 / 16

31,240

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Xeon E7-4890 v2

15 / 30

30,946

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon E7-4890 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Spire), unlike Xeon E7-4890 v2.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 38 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4890 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $270 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E7-4890 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,500 vs 18,040).
❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Xeon E7-4890 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-4890 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8700F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 8700F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 29.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8700F is the stronger fit. You are getting 177.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8700F is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 8700F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $270 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 29.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (115.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8700F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 15/30, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 8700F

The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.

Xeon E7-4890 v2

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 8700F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — a 38.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8700F is built on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8700F scores 31,240 against the Xeon E7-4890 v2's 30,946 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,040 vs 6,500 (94.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,649 vs 730, a 113.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,500 vs 5,500 (84.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon E7-4890 v2
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	15 / 30+88%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+47%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+46%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	37.5 MB+134%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm-82%	22 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	31,240	30,946
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,040+178%	6,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,649+263%	730
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,500+145%	5,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — the Ryzen 7 8700F supports 225% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F) and C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2).

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon E7-4890 v2
Socket	AM5	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+225%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1536 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	32+60%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 8700F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8700F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E7-4890 v2). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU, Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy). Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F; Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2.