Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 7 8700F

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Ryzen family

······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

8 Cores16 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 8700F

8 / 16

31,240

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

8 / 16

31,508

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Spire), unlike Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $270 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

2025

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 8050S, while Ryzen 7 8700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 18,040).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385?

Yes. Ryzen 7 8700F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 9.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 8700F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8700F is the stronger fit. You are getting 9.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8700F is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 8700F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $270 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (115.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 8700F

The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8700F scores 31,240 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,040 vs 16,500 (8.9% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,649 vs 2,886, a 8.6% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,500 vs 14,136 (4.6% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+14%	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (2023−2024)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	31,240	31,508
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,040+9%	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,649	2,886+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,500	14,136+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports 53.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 8700F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Socket	AM5	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	LPDDR5x-8000+54%
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Ryzen 7 8700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F; Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU	Enterprise AI Mobile