Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 8700F
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($257) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Phoenix (2023−2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($257) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Ryzen 7 8700F
The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8700F scores 31,240 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,040 vs 16,500 (8.9% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,649 vs 2,886, a 8.6% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,500 vs 14,136 (4.6% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+14% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 31,240 | 31,508 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,040+9% | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,649 | 2,886+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,500 | 14,136+5% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 8700F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | LPDDR5x-8000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Ryzen 7 8700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F; Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU | Enterprise AI Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
