Core i5-14500 vs Xeon E7-4890 v2

Intel

Core i5-14500

14 Cores20 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2024
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-14500 vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-14500 vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-14500 vs Xeon E7-4890 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-14500

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Xeon E7-4890 v2.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 38 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4890 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
  • Launch MSRP is still $239 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E7-4890 v2

2014

Why buy it

  • +56.3% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • 60% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,500 vs 15,000).
  • 138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i5-14500 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-14500 better than Xeon E7-4890 v2?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-4890 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-14500 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-14500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-14500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 172.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-14500 is the better buy right now. Core i5-14500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $239 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (130.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 15/30. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-14500 vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-14500

The Core i5-14500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,205 points. Launch price was $232.

Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i5-14500 packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-14500 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — a 38.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-14500 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-14500 is built on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-14500 scores 31,205 against the Xeon E7-4890 v2's 30,946 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-14500. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 730, a 114.9% lead for the Core i5-14500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 5,500 (92.7% advantage for the Core i5-14500). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14500 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2.

FeatureCore i5-14500Xeon E7-4890 v2
Cores / Threads
14 / 20
15 / 30+7%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+47%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
37.5 MB+56%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-68%
22 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
31,205
30,946
Cinebench R23 Multi
6,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,700+270%
730
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,000+173%
5,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-14500 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-14500 versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — the Core i5-14500 supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-14500) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-14500) vs 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B760,Z790 (Core i5-14500) and C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2).

FeatureCore i5-14500Xeon E7-4890 v2
Socket
LGA1700
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+200%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
1536 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
32+60%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14500) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E7-4890 v2). The Core i5-14500 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14500 targets Mainstream Desktop, Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy). Direct competitor: Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2.

FeatureCore i5-14500Xeon E7-4890 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Desktop
Enterprise Server (Legacy)