
Core i5-14500

Xeon E7-4890 v2
Core i5-14500 vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-14500 vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-14500 vs Xeon E7-4890 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-14500
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Xeon E7-4890 v2.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 38 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4890 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $239 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E7-4890 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,500 vs 15,000).
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i5-14500 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14500 better than Xeon E7-4890 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14500 vs Xeon E7-4890 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14500
The Core i5-14500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,205 points. Launch price was $232.

Xeon E7-4890 v2
The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14500 packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-14500 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — a 38.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-14500 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-14500 is built on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-14500 scores 31,205 against the Xeon E7-4890 v2's 30,946 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-14500. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 730, a 114.9% lead for the Core i5-14500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 5,500 (92.7% advantage for the Core i5-14500). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14500 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2.
| Feature | Core i5-14500 | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 15 / 30+7% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+47% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 37.5 MB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 31,205 | 30,946 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 6,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700+270% | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000+173% | 5,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14500 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-14500 versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — the Core i5-14500 supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-14500) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-14500) vs 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B760,Z790 (Core i5-14500) and C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2).
| Feature | Core i5-14500 | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+200% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 1536 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 32+60% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14500) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E7-4890 v2). The Core i5-14500 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14500 targets Mainstream Desktop, Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy). Direct competitor: Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2.
| Feature | Core i5-14500 | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | Enterprise Server (Legacy) |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














