Xeon Gold 6132 vs Xeon W-1290P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6132 vs Xeon W-1290P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6132 vs Xeon W-1290P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6132

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1290P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,244 vs 22,373).

Xeon W-1290P

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1290P better than Xeon Gold 6132?

Yes. Xeon W-1290P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 24.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-1290P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 24.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1290P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1290P still makes the most sense overall. Xeon W-1290P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1290P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 14/28. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 6132 vs Xeon W-1290P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6132

The Xeon Gold 6132 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 14 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 22,244 points. Launch price was $2,111.

Xeon W-1290P

The Xeon W-1290P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,373 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6132 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon W-1290P offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Gold 6132 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6132 versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1290P — a 33.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290P (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6132 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1290P uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6132 scores 22,244 against the Xeon W-1290P's 22,373 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-1290P. L3 cache: 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6132 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290P.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6132	Xeon W-1290P
Cores / Threads	14 / 28+40%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	5.2 GHz+41%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.7 GHz+42%
L3 Cache	19.25 MB	20 MB (total)+4%
L2 Cache	14 MB	256K (per core)+1729%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	22,244	22,373

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6132 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1290P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.