Xeon Gold 6210U
VS
Core Ultra 9 185H

Xeon Gold 6210U vs Core Ultra 9 185H

Intel

Xeon Gold 6210U

20 Cores40 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 185H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6210U

#210
EPYC 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
110%
#214
Xeon 6521P
MSRP: $1250|Avg: $1250
107%
#215
Xeon E-2456
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $289
107%
#218
Xeon Gold 5512U
MSRP: $1230|Avg: N/A
104%
#219
Xeon D-1733NT
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
103%
#220
Xeon 6520P
MSRP: $1295|Avg: $1295
102%
#221
Xeon Gold 6314U
MSRP: $2977|Avg: N/A
101%
#222
Xeon E-2478
MSRP: $568|Avg: $269
101%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
100%
#224
Xeon Gold 6210U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
99%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
99%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
98%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
97%
#230
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $368
96%
#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
96%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
95%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
95%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
94%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 185H

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
104%
#152
Core Ultra 9 185H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
99%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
97%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
95%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
95%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Gold 6210U is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon Gold 6210UCore Ultra 9 185H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-H (2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 9 185H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon Gold 6210UCore Ultra 9 185H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6210U and Core Ultra 9 185H

Intel

Xeon Gold 6210U

The Xeon Gold 6210U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,861 points. Launch price was $1,500.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 185H

The Core Ultra 9 185H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,360 points. Launch price was $640.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6210U packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 185H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Xeon Gold 6210U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6210U versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 185H — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 185H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6210U uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 185H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6210U scores 28,861 against the Core Ultra 9 185H's 29,360 — a 1.7% lead for the Core Ultra 9 185H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,000 vs 18,030 (5.2% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6210U). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,234 vs 2,700, a 74.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 185H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,072 vs 17,000 (51.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 185H). L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6210U vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 185H.

FeatureXeon Gold 6210UCore Ultra 9 185H
Cores / Threads
20 / 40+25%
16 / 22
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
5.1 GHz+31%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz+56%
L3 Cache
27.5 MB+15%
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
20 MB+900%
2 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
PassMark
28,861
29,360+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,000+5%
18,030
Geekbench 6 Single
1,234
2,700+119%
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,072
17,000+69%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6210U uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 9 185H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6210U versus LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 on the Core Ultra 9 185H — the Core Ultra 9 185H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6210U supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6210U) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 185H). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6210U) vs 28 (Core Ultra 9 185H) — the Xeon Gold 6210U offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon Gold 6210U) and Meteor Lake SoC (Core Ultra 9 185H).

FeatureXeon Gold 6210UCore Ultra 9 185H
Socket
LGA3647
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB+967%
96 GB
RAM Channels
6+200%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48+71%
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6210U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core Ultra 9 185H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Xeon Gold 6210U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6210U targets High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute, Core Ultra 9 185H targets Mainstream Performance / AI Workloads. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6210U rivals EPYC 7352; Core Ultra 9 185H rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS.

FeatureXeon Gold 6210UCore Ultra 9 185H
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute
Mainstream Performance / AI Workloads