Xeon Gold 6226 vs Xeon Gold 6334

Intel

Xeon Gold 6226

12 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6334

8 Cores16 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

Xeon Gold 6226 vs Xeon Gold 6334 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6226 vs Xeon Gold 6334 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6226 vs Xeon Gold 6334: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6226

2019

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6334 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6334

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (20,512 vs 20,619).
  • 32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6226 better than Xeon Gold 6334?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6334 is ahead with a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6226 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6226 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6226 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6226 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6334 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 6226 vs Xeon Gold 6334 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6226

The Xeon Gold 6226 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,619 points. Launch price was $1,776.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6334

The Xeon Gold 6334 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,512 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6226 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6334 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6226 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6226 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6334 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6226 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6334 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6226 scores 20,619 against the Xeon Gold 6334's 20,512 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6226. L3 cache: 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6226 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6334.

FeatureXeon Gold 6226Xeon Gold 6334
Cores / Threads
12 / 24+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB+7%
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
12 MB+1100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
20,619
20,512
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6226 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6334 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Gold 6226Xeon Gold 6334
Socket
LGA3647
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
3200
Max RAM Capacity
6144
RAM Channels
8
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Gold 6226) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6334). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6334 rivals EPYC 72F3.

FeatureXeon Gold 6226Xeon Gold 6334
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d